This paper draws on insights from a Scottish community planning partnership and highlights the complex and diverse ways in which public services use evidence in decision-making processes.
This study involved an in-depth case study of a single local authority area and included interviews with 20 participants in community planning—service providers, community members and research and policy officers.
The research highlights the complex and diverse ways in which public services use evidence in decision-making processes. While the findings are not generalisable across all Scottish community planning partnerships (CPPs), they provide important insights into the types of knowledge and evidence that become meaningful in this context, and why.
CPPs operate in a context of continual change. Evidence is used in community planning for many reasons, but the focus is increasingly on the need to target and prioritise resources in situations characterised by financial constraints and pressures.
Statistical tools that claim to provide a more reliable source of evidence will have limited impact on public service reform without understanding and respecting the types of knowledge that are valued in day-to-day work and the ways in which different forms of knowledge and evidence interact.
Evidence use in community planning is a craft that involves valuing and interweaving different forms of evidence and knowledge together – recognising that evidence becomes meaningful through communication. The problem in everyday policy making is not normally a lack of evidence, or even its variable quality, but how existing evidence is communicated and the extent to which there is an opportunity for collective learning and informed judgement.
- Strategic managers and policy makers need to value and recognise the knowledge of those operating at the front line.
- Statistical data on poverty and inequality can be highly emotive and can alienate local people if not communicated sensitively.
- If evidence is to be meaningful it needs to be interpreted and contextualised. There is a skill for service providers in ‘speaking the right evidence language’ in the right context.
- Stable collaborative relationships are needed for effective evidence sharing across services. It is important to avoid over-burdening members of staff with too much evidence and focus on the evidence that is useful in their working contexts.
- Community planning processes need to provide more opportunities for engaging with different types of evidence and knowledge.
- Aristotle’s three types of knowledge (see diagram above) are relevant to the types of evidence and knowledge that are useful and valuable in community planning: empirical knowledge drawn from sources such as quantitive and qualititive research; craft knowledge based on practical experience; and practical wisdom – considered judgements on alternatives for practical action underpinned by values and ethics.
- A desirable Scottish approach to evidence in public policy entails integrating empirical evidence, craft knowledge and practical wisdom in a way that recognises the value of all three.
Download the publication
- Making Data Meaningful: Evidence use in a community planning partnership in Scotland (PDF)
- Making Data Meaningful – Model of knowledge types for public service reform poster (PDF)
Date of publication: September 2018
Publication type: Discussion paper
Case site paper that discusses the experience of What Works Scotland, the Glasgow Centre for Population Health and the West Dunbartonshire Community Planning Team in developing community profiles for the purposes of place-based working.